Medical Negligence : An Overview

Main Article Content

Bratin Kumar Dey

Abstract

Medical professionals are treated as next to God. They provide humanitarian services and gives solace to individuals suffering from various diseases and disorders. Due to their great service to humanity, the doctors and medical professionals are treated with reverence and since the ancient times the medical profession has been considered as a noble profession. However with the passage of time, there has been a change in the doctor - patient relationship. During the last few decades a number of incidents have come to light in which the patients have suffered due to the error and inadvertent conduct of doctors. Due to the increasing conflicts and legal disputes between the doctors and patients, most of the legal systems have developed various rules and principles to deal with such inadvertent behavior of doctors. This has led to the development of a new branch of jurisprudence, i.e. medical negligence. Hence, any negligence on part of the medical professional would be treated as either a tort of negligence or a deficiency in service under Consumer Protection Act, 1986. As the profession involves the idea of an occupation requiring purely intellectual skills or of manual skills controlled by the intellectual skill of the operator, it is distinctively different from an occupation, which is substantially production or sale or arrangement for the production or sale of commodities. Medicine is a highly complex domain. It is difficult for consumer laws to review medical negligence cases with flawless technical clarity and accuracy. Thus medical negligence is not purely a matter of consideration for judiciary but also the technical inputs of specialized experts in the field have substantial weightage while deciding the case of medical negligence against doctors. The present paper is devoted to introvert inspection of negligence in medical profession in the light of existing laws with more emphasis on the interpretation of consumer protection law by judiciary.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Dey BK. Medical Negligence : An Overview. BJOHNS [Internet]. 2017Apr.30 [cited 2024May17];25(1):46-54. Available from: https://www.bjohns.in/journal3/index.php/bjohns/article/view/111
Section
Invited article
Author Biography

Bratin Kumar Dey, High Court Calcutta

Advocate

High Court Calcutta

References

Article, Medical Negligence and the law, K K S R Murthy, Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, July – September 2007; IV(3) : [116,117]

http://www.dnaindia.com/mumbai/report_court-has-killed-all-medical negligence-cases_1350940 court has killed all medical negligence cases Published : Monday, Feb 22, 2010: 0: 12IST By MS Kamath I Place : Mumbai Agency : DNA

Indian Journal of Medical Ethics 2005 Oct-Dec 2; 4. Supreme Court Judgment on criminal Medical Negligence : a challenge to the profession, MR Hariharan Nair.

http://www.medindia.net/doctors/cpa/case-1-9.asp, landmark case, Dr. K. Mathiharan (Consultant Legal Medicine) Institute of Legal Medicine 53/27, 5th Street, Padmanabha Nagar, Adayar, Chennai – 600 020.

http://www.financialexpress.com/news/charity-hospital-death-patient-still-a-consumer-must-get-compensation/746170/1to4, Charity hospital death ? Patient still a consumer, must get compensation, Agencies, Posted : Friday, Feb 04, 2011; at 1504 hrs IST.

http://www.heathlibrary.com/book9_chapter542.htm Medical profession and consumer protection act by Dr. Jagdish Singh.

Bolam Vs. Friern Hospital Management Committee [(1957) 2 All ER 118 (QBD)]

AIR 2005 Crl. L.J. 3710

Indian Medical Association Vs. VP Shantha [AIR 1996 SC 550]

Dr. Laxman Balkrishna Joshi Vs. Dr. Trimbak Bapu Godbole & Another [(1969) 1 SCR 206]

AIR 1996 (2) SCC 634

AIR 1998 SC 1801

AIR 2010 SC 1162

AIR 2010 (2) UAD 331

AIR 2010 SC 1050

AIR 2001 SC 3914

AIR 2009 6 SCC 1

AIR 2013 7 Supreme 323