A Comparative Study of Outcomes of Type I Tympanoplasty with or without Fibrin Glue

Main Article Content

Somu Lakshmanan
Preethi Umamaheswaran

Abstract

Introduction:


Various materials have been used in tympanoplasty to ensure the adherence of the graft with the remnant tympanic membrane. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of type I tympanoplasty done with and without fibrin glue.


Materials and Methods:          


This is a prospective comparative study conducted in a tertiary care centre between August 2014 and July 2016. A sample size of 70 patients was used. The patients were randomly divided into two groups – Group A and Group B. Patients in group A underwent tympanoplasty with fibrin glue and patients in group B underwent tympanoplasty without fibrin glue. The patients were followed up for 6 months and the postoperative hearing improvement and graft uptake rates were compared.


Results:


The pre-operative mean pure tone average for group A was 34.33±7.3dB; it improved to 22.14±6.5 at the end of 6 months. In group B, it improved from 34.25±8dB to 22.64±7.4dB at the end of 6 months. There was no statistical significance in hearing improvement between both the groups. Though there was no statistically significant difference in the graft uptake rates between group A (94.3%) and group B (91.4%), fibrin glue had better outcomes with larger perforations.


Conclusion:


The use of fibrin glue in tympanoplasty is safe and it has a particular advantage in the graft uptake in subtotal perforations.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Lakshmanan S, Umamaheswaran P. A Comparative Study of Outcomes of Type I Tympanoplasty with or without Fibrin Glue. BJOHNS [Internet]. 2019Apr.30 [cited 2024May18];27(1):15-8. Available from: https://www.bjohns.in/journal3/index.php/bjohns/article/view/220
Section
Main article
Author Biographies

Somu Lakshmanan, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research Porur, Chennai -600011

Professor & Head of the Department, Dept of ENT, Head & Neck Surgery

Preethi Umamaheswaran, Apollo Specialty Hospital, Chennai

Registrar, Department of ENT, Head & Neck, Skullbase Surgery

References

Proctor B. A Statistical Review of 177 Tympanoplasties. A.M.A. Archives of Otolaryngology 1960; 71:123-31

Saliba I. Hyaluronic acid fat graft myringoplasty: how we do it. Clinical Otolaryngology 2008; 33: 610-4. doi:10.1111/j.1749-4486.2008.01823.x

Yuasa R, Saijo S, Tomioka Y et al. Office closure of eardrum perforation with fibrin glue (in Japanese), Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (Tokyo) 1989; 61:1117-22

Sakagami M. Simple underlay myringoplasty. The Journal of Laryngology and Otology 2007; 121:840-4

Lai P, Propst EJ. Lateral graft type I tympanoplasty using alloderm for tympanic membrane reconstruction in children. International Journal of Pediatric Otolaryngology 2006; 70: 1423-9

Maeta M, Saito R, Nakagawa F, Miyahara T et al. A clinical comparison of orthodox myringoplasty and a simple method with fibrin glue. Nippon-Jibiinkoka- Gakkai-Kaiho 1998; 101:1062-8

Furukawa M, Hayashi C, Narabayashi O et al. Surgical Management of Myringosclerosis over an Entire Perforated Tympanic Membrane by Simple Underlay Myringoplasty. International Journal of Otolaryngology, vol. 2016, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2894932

O'Connor F, Shea JJ. A biologic adhesive for otologic practice. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1980; 90: 347-8

G. Schlag G, H. Redl H. Fibrin Sealant in Operative Medicine: Volume 1: Otorhinolaryngology”, Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.