Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy: Advantage over External Approach

Main Article Content

Bijan Basak
Kaustuv Das Biswas
Subhradev Biswas
Ankit Choudhary

Abstract

Introduction


Although external DCR was considered to be the Gold Standard treatment for NLD obstruction, endoscopic DCR appears to give comparable results,  with the advantage of the absence of external facial scar and no disruption of the medial palpebral ligament or the angular facial vessels. This study aims to evaluate the outcome of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) and compare with the outcome of external DCR, based on data available on literature search.


Materials and Methods


In this prospective, longitudinal, interventional study, 67 cases of chronic dacryocystitis were operated endoscopically from January 2017 to December 2018. All patients were documented about detailed medical and operative history, thorough medical check up including ocular and ENT examination. Level of obstruction of nasolacrimal duct (NLD) was diagnosed by lacrimal syringing and probing.


Surgery was performed under local anaesthesia except in uncooperative patients where general anaesthesia was used. 0˚ & 30˚ endoscopes were used in surgery. The surgical outcomes and complications were recorded, analyzed and compared to those of external DCR from available literature.  


Results


The overall success rate of endoscopic DCR was 94.7%, which is closely comparable to external DCR.


Conclusion


Endoscopic DCR is an effective and safe alternative to external DCR, with comparable results and better patient satisfaction.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Basak B, Biswas KD, Biswas S, Choudhary A. Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy: Advantage over External Approach. BJOHNS [Internet]. 2019Aug.31 [cited 2024May18];27(2):161-6. Available from: https://www.bjohns.in/journal3/index.php/bjohns/article/view/244
Section
Our experience
Author Biographies

Bijan Basak, IPGMER & SSKM Hospital, Kolkata

Associate Professor

Department of ENT & Head and Neck Surgery

Kaustuv Das Biswas, SSKM hospital and IPGMER

RMO cum Clinical Tutor

Department of ENt & Head and Neck Surgery

Subhradev Biswas, SSKM hospital and IPGMER

Assistant Professor

Department of ENt & Head and Neck Surgery

Ankit Choudhary, SSKM hospital and IPGMER

Senior Resident

Department of ENt & Head and Neck Surgery

References

Toti A. Nuovo metodo conservatore dicura radical delle suppurazioni croniche del sacco lacrimale (dacriocistorinostomia). Clin Mod Firenze. 1904; 10:385-7

Dupuy-Dutemps MM, Bourguet ET. Note preliminaire sur un proded de dacrocystorhinostomie. Ann D`Ocul. (Paris) 1920; 157:1445-7

Tarbet KJ, Custer PL. External dacryocystorhinostomy. Surgical success, patient satisfaction, and economic cost. Ophthalmol. 1995; 102:1065-70

Mekonnen W, Adamu Y. Outcome of external dacryocystorhinostomy in Ethiopian patients. Ethiop Med J. 2009; 47:221-6

Fayers T, Laverde T, Tay E, Olver JM. Lacrimal surgery success after external dacryocystorhinostomy: Functional and anatomical results using strict outcome criteria. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 25:472-5

Warren JF, Seiff SR, Kavanagh MC. Long-term results of external dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2005; 36:446-50

Caldwell GW. Two new operations for obstruction of the nasal duct with preservation of the canaliculi and with an incidental description of a new lacrimal probe. Am J Ophthalmol. 1893; 10:189-93

Rice DH. Endoscopic intranasal dacryocystorhinostomy: Results in 4 patients. Arch Otolaryngol.1990; 116:1061

Mc Donough M, Meiring JH. Endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy. J Laryngol and Otol. 1989; 103:585-7

Wormald PJ. Powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Laryngoscope 2002; 112(1):69-72

Karim R, Ghabrial R, Lynch TF, Tang B. A comparison of external and endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Clin Ophthalmol. 2011; 5:979–89

Khan MK, Hossain MA, Hossain MJ, Al-Masud A, Rahman MZ. Comparative study of external and endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy for the treatment of chronic dacryocystitis. JAFMC Bangladesh 2011; 7:15–7

Amadi AJ. Endoscopic DCR vs External DCR: What's Best in the Acute Setting? J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2017; 12(3): 251-3

Shun-Shin GA, Thurairajan G. External dacryocystorhinostomy-an end of an era? Br J Ophthalmol. 1997; 81:716-7

Zhou W, Zhou M, Li Z, Wang T. Endoscopic intranasal dacryocystorhinostomy in forty-five patients. Chin Med J (Engl). 1996; 109:747-8

Smith W, Merkonidis C, Draper M, Yung M. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in warfarinized patients. Am J Otolaryngol. 2006; 27:327-9

Jin HR, Yeon JY, Choi MY. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: Creation of a large marsupialized lacrimal sac. J Korean Med Sci. 2006; 21:719-23

Hurwitz JJ, Rutherford S. Computerized survey of lacrimal surgery patients. Ophthalmology 1986; 93:14-9

Tan NC, Rajapaksa SP, Gaynor J, Nair SB. Mechanical endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy-a reproducible technique. Rhinology 2009; 47:310-5

Moras K, Bhat M, Shreyas CS, Mendonca N, Pinto G. External dacryocystorhinostomy versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: A comparison. J Clin Diagn Res. 2011; 5:182-6

Nichlani SS, Jagade MV, Ganeshan A. A comparative study between endoscopic and external approach dacryocystorhinostomy. Bombay Hosp J. 2010; 52:189-96

Aslam S, Awan AH, Tayyab M. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: A Pakistani experience. Pak J Ophthalmol. 2010; 26:2-6

Muscatello L, Giudice M, Spriano G, Tondini L. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: Personal experience. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005; 25:209-13

Hartikainen J, Antila J, Varpula M, Puukka P, Sepp H, Grénman R. Prospective randomized comparison of endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy and external dacryocystorhinostomy. Laryngoscope 1998; 108:1861-6

Cokkeser Y, Evereklioglu C, Er H. Comparative external versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: results in 115 patients (130 eyes). Otolaryngol Head and Neck Surg. 2000;123(4):488-91

Dolman PJ. Comparison of external dacryocystorhinostomy with non laser endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmol. 2003; 110(1):78-84

Gauba V. External versus endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy in a specialized lacrimal surgery center. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2014; 28:36-9

Pei-Yuan S. Comparison of endoscopic and external dacryocystorhinostomy for treatment of primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2008; 8(1):19-23

Saha R, Kumar P, Maurya RP, Singh VP, Singh MK, Kumar R. Endoscopic Vs External Approach DCR: A comparative Analysis. Ind J Cl and Expmntl Ophthalmol. 2015; 1(3):134-42

Tsirbas A, Wormald PJ. Mechanical endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with mucosal flaps. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003; 87:43-7

Woog JJ, Metson R, Puliafito CA. Holmium YAG endo-nasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993; 116:1-10

Camara JG, Bengzon AU, Henson RD. The safety and efficacy of mitomycin C in endonasal endoscopic laser–assisted dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 16:114-8

Hausler R, Caversaccio M. Microsurgical endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with long term insertion of bicanilicular silicon tubes. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998; 124: 188-91

Neuhaus RW, Baylis HI. Cerebrospinal fluid leakage after dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmol. 1983; 90:1091-5.

Wesley RE, Bond JB. Intranasal procedures for successful lacrimal surgery. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986; 2:153-7

Hurwitz JJ, Eplett CJ, Fliss D, Freeman JL. Orbital hemorrhage during dacryocystorhinostomy. Can J Ophthalmol. 1992; 27:139-42

Jae Wook Yong, Ha Na Oh. Success rate and complication of endonasal dacrocystorhinostomy with unciformectomy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012; 250:1509-13.